nsrnicek:

“Since we are forced to divulge our itinerary to the police under the new ‘special law’ aimed at restricting the right to associate and demonstrate…” (via Phillippe Fournier on Facebook)

(Reblogged from nsrnicek)
[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

susie-c:

In November, after I was arrested while reporting on the General Strike in Oakland, Alameda County sheriffs and a nurse who didn’t identify herself made me pee into a cup. This was in an open cell, as other sheriffs, nurses and inmates walked by. I tried to do it quickly. I wanted to get it over with. I wanted to cooperate.

But I also wanted to know why I was being forced to take a pregnancy test upon my booking for a cite and release misdemeanor which technically only need involve the police giving me a ticket.

Neither the sheriffs nor the nurse would tell me why they needed to know the contents of my uterus. In the following months, others subjected to this test said they were told they needed to take the test because the county jail in Oakland, Glen Dyer, is “not equipped” with the health services to hold pregnant women over night. I was booked into Dyer between 4 and 5 a.m. on November 3, transferred to Santa Rita, the only county jail allowed to hold women, around 10 a.m. I was finally released around 6 p.m. I guess it depends on your definition of “overnight.”

A few weeks ago, I went back to Santa Rita Jail for the first time since my stay there in November, this time not in plastic handcuffs, instead accompanied by Berkeley City Council member Linda Maio. Maio reached out after hearing my talk of my jail experience on KPFA, particularly the sexual harassment surrounding the searches of women; she arranged the meeting, but asked me to lead the questioning.

We met with six sheriffs deputies charged with operating the county jail system, including the undersheriff of the entire department, Rich Lucia, and the department’s legal counsel. We discussed many things about county jail treatment that day — the meeting lasted nearly two hours. On some issues, the sheriffs were nonplussed; on others, they didn’t even want to meet my eye. But on pregnancy tests, they were emphatic, confident. 

“That’s Corizon policy, that’s not our policy,” they said. Their legal counsel agreed, and expressed his disappointment that they had not asked a Corizon official to attend the meeting as well.

Corizon is the third-party health care provider for both of Alameda County’s jails, and more than 400 other jails across the country. They have their own item in the budget, a four year contract worth more than $120 million and rising every year. 

Corizon is less than a year old. It formed as the result of a merger last June between Valitás Health Services, Inc., the parent company of Correctional Medical Services, Inc., and America Service Group Inc., the parent company of PHS Correctional Healthcare, Inc., cornering the prison health care market in the U.S. Their promotional video for this new venture is posted above.

In this country, in this county, we are now beyond private companies providing public services — the county jails have outsourced their health services for years, to the tune of more than $30 million each year. But now we also allow them to dictate the policies of those services. Corizon does those pregnancy tests in order to protect Corizon from potential litigation from inmates. I can understand that — if I were Corizon, I’d want to downgrade my liability too, especially since if I were Corizon I’d be facing more than 20 other lawsuits right now.

I never thought, when I was peeing into that cup at 5:30 a.m., that six months later I’d be digging up Corizon’s paper trail all over Alameda County. I’ll be wrapping up this story after May Day. 

I wasn’t sure if I should post this piece of the story now or wait until the full piece was finished. 

I think, though, that Alameda County residents and those who might be seeing the insides of its jails soon (May Day eve!) deserve to know exactly who is making them pee into those cups, and why.

(Reblogged from susie-c)
Stand Up Fight Back, Occupy Oakland Move-In Day (26 of 31) (by glennshootspeople)

Stand Up Fight Back, Occupy Oakland Move-In Day (26 of 31) (by glennshootspeople)

vicemag:

I don’t like people who wear sweatpants in public. I think it makes them look like lazy fatasses. But I don’t want to make sweatpants illegal because, duh, I don’t think the things I hate should be illegal. That’s, like, the fundamental great thing about America, isn’t it—that we can live together and be peaceful while also respecting one another’s right to be different from one another?

Harry’s Freedom Foxhole - When Saggy Pants Are Outlawed

(Reblogged from vicemag)
(Reblogged from occupywallstreet)
(Reblogged from scottrossi)

stonerparty:

Obama: From First to Worst on Medical Marijuana

by Rob Kampia Executive director, Marijuana Policy Project

During his run for the presidency, Barack Obama instilled hope in medical marijuana supporters by pledging to respect state laws on the matter. And for the first two years of his term, he was generally faithful to his promise. Yet suddenly, and with no logical explanation, over the past eight months he has become arguably the worst president in U.S. history regarding medical marijuana.

1. In 1970, Nixon signed into law the Controlled Substances Act, which placed marijuana in Schedule I — the most restrictive of the five schedules, which declared that marijuana has no medical value whatsoever. Since then, all seven presidents have been content to keep marijuana in Schedule I, even going so far as to have (1) DEA bureaucrats overrule the DEA’s own administrative law judge on the matter, and (2) Health & Human Services reject scientific petitions for rescheduling.

2. In 1978, the Carter administration created the “compassionate IND” program, which allowed patients to apply to (what is now known as) HHS to legally receive monthly shipments of the federal government’s marijuana. Reagan left this program untouched for all eight years of his administration, but the first Bush closed the program to new applicants halfway through his term.

3. From 1969 to 1992, it was relatively easy for state governments and private institutions to investigate marijuana’s therapeutic uses: The mechanism was to get FDA approval for a research protocol, then obtain DEA permission to store and handle the marijuana, and then NIDA would provide the marijuana. After Clinton took office, his team created a new hurdle, requiring a separate HHS review of the scientific merit of an FDA-approved research protocol, which has essentially prevented all but a few research projects from moving forward over the last 18 years. Indeed, just last month, Obama’s HHS rejected an FDA-approved protocol that would have researched whether marijuana can reduce PTSD among combat veterans.

4. After California voters passed the first state medical marijuana law in November 1996, the Clinton administration threatened to take away the prescription-writing authority of physicians who recommend medical marijuana to patients. This bad policy was successfully blocked in federal court on First Amendment grounds.

5. In 1998, the Clinton administration filed a civil lawsuit to close down the premier Oakland dispensary at that time; this case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled 8-0 against that dispensary in 2001. Since then, the Bush and Obama administrations have routinely dragged dispensary owners into federal court. Most recently, on October 7, Obama’s four federal prosecutors in California announced a coordinated plan to shut down most dispensaries in the state.

6. Clinton’s drug czar actively spoke out against good ballot initiatives in 1996, 1998, and 2000. And Bush’s drug czar campaigned against ballot initiatives and state-level bills for all eight years of the Bush administration. Obama’s drug czar hasn’t lobbied or campaigned against medical marijuana reform measures (yet), but he has publicly opposed medical marijuana generally.

7. In 2000, Clinton signed into law a bill that made it harder for the federal government to seize property through civil lawsuits. Unfortunately, the federal government can still wreak havoc when it wants to, and the Bush and Obama administrations have both threatened some landlords (almost exclusively in California) with property forfeiture if they lease their properties to medical marijuana growers or dispensaries.

8. The IRS started going after medical marijuana businesses under the second Bush regime, and the IRS has continued doing so under Obama. In a fluke of how federal law is written, the IRS is arguing that businesses can actually deduct the cost of the marijuana that they’re selling, but businesses cannot deduct other costs (rent, salaries, insurance, supplies) that any other business would normally deduct. If this doesn’t change, almost all dispensaries will either go out of business or become tax evaders; either way, the federal government will be deprived of tax revenues.

9. This past spring, Obama’s U.S. attorneys in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington state issued letters to local and state government officials at carefully chosen times, for the purpose of killing medical marijuana reform measures or hampering implementation in each state.

10. Over the last couple of years, medical marijuana businesses have been having trouble finding banking institutions that are willing to accept their money. When members of Congress asked Obama’s Treasury Department for guidance, the Treasury Department said that each banking institution would have to determine its own tolerance for risk — without defining what might constitute a risky situation. And now, just in the past couple of weeks, the Obama administration has been scaring California banks into dropping all businesses that are involved with medical marijuana.

11. On September 21, Obama’s ATF issued an open letter saying that gun shops cannot sell guns to medical marijuana patients — or people who are known to be addicted to drugs other than alcohol or tobacco, ironically enough.

So those are the footnotes for the chart. Depressing, huh?

But there may be a way forward through this mess: Since Colorado, Maine, and New Mexico set up state-licensing systems for medical marijuana businesses in recent years, literally zero such businesses in these three states have been raided by the feds.

(All the raids we hear about — in California, Michigan, Montana, and Washington state — do not involve any state-licensed businesses. At best, some of the targeted businesses were licensed by local governments in California under a loosely worded provision of California state law.)

Technically, federal prosecutors can civilly or criminally target any marijuana businesses they want — in any state — until we change federal law. But, for the time being, the feds appear not to be targeting medical marijuana businesses with state licenses.

It’s worth noting that my organization has successfully enacted new laws that include state licensing in Arizona, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Vermont over the last two years. (And D.C. and New Jersey have licensing systems, too.)

So we may have a way forward. Unfortunately, the plan now assumes hostility from the former marijuana user in the White House who used to profess notions of hope, change, and compassion toward the less fortunate. Shame on him.

(Reblogged from stonerparty)

vicemag:

Is this some kind of cop joke?

(Reblogged from vicemag)
This is not going away any time soon. And we don’t mind that. We don’t mind marches and protests. We understand that. What we don’t want is the criminal behavior that goes with it. If you want to have a protest, great, we will help you, let’s work together. You want to have a march? We will help block traffic, we will make sure no one’s hurt, that everyone’s safe. But if you’re going to have criminal activity where you’re endangering people around you, that won’t be tolerated. There are factors we really have to take into consideration as a city. This is not just an OPD thing — this is a community thing. And this is going to effect our tourism. You know, the city of Oakland was just named #5 greatest place to visit in the world by the New York Times. We have this great piece of publicity and now we have kind of this shadow of marches that do turn — some of them, not all of them — turn violent. Things are being thrown, set on fire, damaged. We don’t need that. We need revenue in this city. We want people to say, I want to go to Oakland this summer.
OPD public information officer Johnna Watson to me today on Occupy Oakland. Full piece on the latest arrests and OPD’s new “smarter policing” at AlterNet coming as soon as the great Joshua Holland edits it. (via susie-c)
(Reblogged from susie-c)
(Reblogged from susie-c)